About Us Calendar of Events Free Trials Books Contact Us Home
Public Utilities Report, Inc.

PRODUCTS:

Public Utilities Fortnightly & Spark

Utility Regulatory News
PUR Guide
PUR4th Series
 

NEW PRODUCT INFORMATION:

Fortnightly Magazine
Current Issue | Back Issues | Online Search | Order | Renew Subscription | Free Trial
Reprints | Staff | Media Kit
Spark Newsletter
Description | Current/Back Issues | Order

Energy Strategy


Satisfying Customers Online?

 

October 15, 2000

By Paul Shea

 

Use new measures to find out, or be left behind.

"How well are we meeting customer expectations?"

It's a question I hear at energy companies all the time. For years, utilities have measured their performance through mass-mailed customer satisfaction surveys. Completed forms would flood in, and marketing and sales teams would evaluate them. It's been a good approach in many respects. But annual survey mailings alone won't cut it in a deregulating energy market where business increasingly is conducted via the Internet.

As a growing percentage of customers is able to choose their electric and gas suppliers, energy companies have become more proactive about meeting customer expectations. They pour over tools such as the J.D. Power and Associates/Navigant Consulting "Electric Utility Customer Satisfaction Study," to gain a better understanding of how they perform compared to competitors. Poor rankings can mean that an energy company is vulnerable to losing customers to a more customer-focused provider.

The number of variables for measuring performance has grown significantly with increased use of the Internet. Customers now can access the energy provider using the web, and receive in real time, anytime, products and services that once required assistance from a customer service representative. And the impact of the Internet will only grow. There is no doubt that energy providers that choose not to use the Internet for e-business or that do so in an ineffective or limited way will reap the consequences. As these firms face customers that have more information and switching ease than ever, their survival will depend on exploiting the potential of the web.

Energy Initiatives are Hit or Miss

Several energy companies have been aggressive in using e-business to better serve customers.

Florida Power & Light uses its website at www.fpl.com as a vehicle for offering products and services to customers, as well as information on current events, storm preparation, and home and business safety. For example, the site offers customers opportunities to save on their energy bills through a free home energy survey for residential customers and energy-management services for business customers.

Detroit Edison is another company that's been innovative in e-business. Through its site at www.detroitedison.com, the company allows its business customers to review online monthly bills and energy consumption costs, and receive graphical analysis for use in improving energy efficiency. This tool, "Energy Audit," helps companies forecast annual usage and spending, as well as time-of-day usage and seasonal expenditures.

Though FP&L and Detroit Edison have taken the lead in e-business, many energy companies continue to offer little in the way of online products. Recently I contacted a Northeast utility and asked the customer representative to explain the Internet services being offered, and why I should use its site instead of a competitor's. Unfortunately, the representative was not familiar with how the site operated, nor could he offer a reason I should use the utility's website. Instead, he suggested that I e-mail the utility for Internet support.

I found this was a common scenario when I called random energy providers and utilities for information. Based on my experience, energy companies that fail to implement e-commerce initiatives will be rewarded with less than stellar results, regardless of their speed, innovation, and flexibility in other business areas.

Too Soon for e-Business Measures?

It is the rare energy executive that would launch an initiative without establishing, at a minimum, a means for measuring the return on investment over time. My research and discussions with energy practitioners reveals, however, that while the use of e-business continues to increase in the industry, the ability to measure its impact is limited. But this need to measure the positive and negative results of Internet investment will increase, and once benchmarks are established, the findings will be useful.

For now, at a minimum, utility companies should develop simple cost-benefit models that analyze online spending patterns, customer "hits" on a website vs. Internet products sold, and Internet spending per customer vs. total marketing spending per customer. These tools seem trivial and traditional, but they are effective. A company may need to weigh the value of an initiative with a negative or breakeven cost-benefit, regardless of its glamour. Additionally, energy companies should not lose sight of traditional sources of feedback-namely, customer satisfaction surveys.

Some energy providers allow customers to contact them through e-mail. The majority of the time, these communications are informal, and the level of attention they receive is based on the customer's size and energy spending. Energy firms would benefit from developing online customer satisfaction surveys, and using the data gathered to improve their web initiatives. They also should let customers know what changes they can expect based on survey findings, and when. The personalization and speed of online interaction will help energy companies better meet customer expectations and improve loyalty.

For the companies that have taken a chance with e-business, the investment appears to be worthwhile. For those that remain unsure of how to take advantage of the Internet, there are plenty of opportunities to launch initiatives already proven by the first-movers. But all energy companies need to focus on measuring the success of their efforts. Regardless of this e-business trend, the basics of serving customers won't change. New products will be launched to meet customer demands, companies will need to be competitive on price and service, and shareholders will insist on having consistent growth. Ensuring these fundamentals will require measurement and customer feedback.

Paul Shea is a project manager at BusinessEdge Solutions, Edison, N.J. He has been providing energy consulting and solutions to clients for more than five years. Please contact Shea at pshea@businessedge.com.

Articles found on this page are available to Internet subscribers only. For more information about obtaining a username and password, please call our Customer Service Department at 1-800-368-5001.






Public Utilities Reports 8229 Boone Boulevard, Suite 400, Vienna, VA 22182-2623
Voice: (703) 847-7720 Toll Free: (800) 368-5001 FAX: (703) 847-0683
Copyright © 2007 PUR Inc.
Email: pur@pur.com

Public Utilities Reports, Inc.